Commentary

Commentary: Jen Nossokoff

The Future of San Francisco Politics

By Jen Nossokoff

One of the first questions that I was asked after I filed to run for district supervisor was: “Are you a progressive or a moderate?”

This is a seemingly simple, benign question. It’s kind of like being asked “Are you a Democrat or a Republican?” Except that one is easy to answer (lifelong Democrat) because Democrats and Republicans have fundamentally different ideologies. The San Francisco progressive-moderate divide is a whole other beast. Democrats are the big tent party and San Francisco is a prime example of what that means. 

San Francisco has a beautiful political spectrum that represents our wonderfully diverse population. And when you sit down with more and more people and get to understand the issues that are most important to them and the solutions they want to see for the City, you see very quickly how most San Franciscans are moving targets on that spectrum, issue by issue. We need to recognize the value that the progressives, moderates and everyone in between bring to the table in order to navigate through challenges and deliver meaningful results for our City. 

We are incredibly lucky to live in a city where we’re not debating whether or not women should have a right to their bodies (they should), or if we should allow weapons of war freely on our streets (we shouldn’t), or if systemic inequalities have existed and still exist in policing today (they have and they do). We need to refocus our priorities on our shared common goals and remember that we are all people who want to see a city with a decrease in crime, cleaner and safer streets, thriving small businesses, healthy public schools, more abundant housing and robust public transit.  

In addition to these specific issues, bridging the political divide in San Francisco can foster a more transparent and accountable government. A healthy democracy thrives on dialogue and debate, but it also requires consensus and cooperation. Elected officials from both sides of the San Francisco political aisle should be willing to listen to their constituents, engage in constructive discussions and work together to find common ground.

Right now, our local political machine is stalled. The ongoing division is coming at a cost to all San Franciscans. It’s time for our political leaders to set aside their differences and prioritize the well-being of the City. A united front between progressives and moderates can provide the necessary checks and balances to ensure that policies are both forward-thinking and executable. 

San Francisco is a world leader on a number of issues – including social justice and environmental sustainability – due to our fast and hard hold on progressive values. I’m really, really proud to live here for that reason. But we also have a moderate sector working to maintain fiscal responsibility and practicality in application of those values. We need both factions to work in lock step with our values to demonstrate to the world what is possible everywhere. 

So, am I a progressive or a moderate? The answer is a little of both, with a lot of motivation to bring the two together for San Francisco. I’m deeply compassionate and also pragmatic. And I firmly believe that the two are not mutually exclusive. 

And now my challenge to you, as you have demonstrated a level of interest in San Francisco politics by reading this to the end, is to stay curious about your fellow neighbors and to remain engaged. If and when you feel powerless, focus on the things that you can do. Meet a new neighbor or strike up a conversation with an old one. Attend a community event. Pick up trash and pull weeds on your block, and chat with people as they walk by. Don’t expect to agree on everything but do anticipate and seek out areas where you align and build on that. Focus on the issues and remember that we are all people. Don’t underestimate the power of conversations as a means to positively shape the future of San Francisco politics; discourse is the oil that greases our political machines and that can start with you. We can begin to bridge the divide on a hyperlocal level, and we need to do it together.   


Jen Nossokoff is a district supervisor candidate and passionate advocate for District 1. She is an SFUSD parent and Board-Certified Physician Assistant. To learn more about Jen’s vision for the neighborhood, visit Jen2024.vote or email hello@jennossokoff.com to start a conversation.

6 replies »

  1. Thank you for sharing this summary of your stance on this topic, and the wonderful reminder what everyone in the community can do to to connect to each other, even from your home. I really like hearing of your blend of progressive and moderate and not feeling the pressure to subscribe to one title. You’ve got my vote Jen, thanks!

    Like

  2. However, a nicely worded piece defining an amorphous region between progressive and moderate does not delineate your actual policy positions.

    Very interesting that you get two follow ups with “you got my vote”.

    And btw Heather, what exactly is a “stance on” the topic of the amorphous region between progressive and moderate when the person makes no firm “stance” on any substantive policy position?

    I wouldn’t call what goes on here in the comment section “discourse”. It’s a place for people to post nicely worded pronouncements in lieu of a public relations campaign, followed by a commentariati that sounds like an astroturf campaign instead of a grassroots phenomenom.

    I love Connie Chan. She is the real deal.

    Like

    • Concur that there is nothing actually substantive here and that these “you get my vote” comments are suspicious. I am not sure who I will vote for and I don’t have any particular allegiance to Connie Chan. But I have been following this new candidate since she announced her campaign and I have yet to see her mention one substantive thing that she plans to do as district supervisor. Most concerning is that she does not appear to think outside the needs of her own demographic (white democrats). Case in point with this whole progressive vs moderate essay she’s written to achieve what goal? Get votes from people just like her that are already going to vote for her? She does not even take one second to mention residents that may not fall into either category. If you are elected and want to lead affectively you do not get to just lead the people who are just like you or voted for you. You represent every in your district! This all may sound harsh but when you run for office you do sign up for it. Not to mention if we will be paying her salary with our hard earned tax dollars it’s our civic duty to demand representation.

      Like

  3. While it all sounds very nice I am confused at the point of this article or what this candidate’s actual goals are as a supervisor. It’s all very superficial and doesn’t focus on real issues that people deal with on a day to day level. Your approach to local politics appears to be more suited to someone running for state or federal office caught up in big picture issues like climate change and world peace. As a local leader you have to be willing to get your hands dirty and really dig into the issues. They will not be fun and sexy topics. It’s not going to all be cute photos ops where you get to pick up trash and chat with neighbors. It is a privilege to be a public servant and WE the taxpayers are the ones who pay your salary. You don’t just write an undergrad essay on your view of different political philosophies and call it a day. Speaking of that, you talk about moderates and progressives and everyone in between. But it sounds like you don’t realize that there are also conservatives here as well. Or maybe you have no interest in actually representing them even though they would still be your constituents. It does appear that you have a great deal to learn about the people of San Francisco and the Richmond district and just local politics in general.

    Like

Leave a reply to mimi wong Cancel reply