City Hall

City Hall: Joel Engardio

More on Prop. K Fallout

I respect the views of Sunset voters who opposed Proposition K. Many have told me they didn’t feel heard in their objection to it being on the ballot. I take this feedback to heart because it’s important to me that everyone is heard.

As your supervisor, we won’t agree 100% on every issue. But I always want to hear the concerns of my constituents and work to address them. I am committed to opening my door to you 100% of the time. That includes my phone and email in-box. I’ve already corresponded with and talked to hundreds of residents in the past month.

What I’ve been hearing loud and clear is a need to address neighborhood traffic and street safety concerns. My mission is to work with you. Together, we can improve our neighborhoods.

I understand many are worried that Prop. K will lead to increased traffic on side streets. Or that Sunset Boulevard and Lincoln Way won’t be able to handle the traffic diverted from the Great Highway. Traffic engineers are working on improvements to ensure cars will get where they need to go. I will keep you informed throughout the park and traffic planning process and seek your input.

Next Steps with Rec. and Park

Rec. and Park has jurisdiction over the Upper Great Highway and is leading the implementation of Prop. K. Rec. and Park is seeking approvals from the Coastal Commission that will allow for better traffic circulation on the Great Highway at Lincoln Way and Sloat Boulevard. Rec. and Park says the closure could happen in the first quarter of 2025, after some key traffic issues are addressed – such as a new traffic signal coming online at Sloat Boulevard and Skyline Drive to replace a three-way stop sign. Construction upgrades and repaving on Sunset Boulevard will be completed soon, allowing for much better traffic flow.

I am working with city departments to better coordinate those traffic improvements. For example, SFMTA and the Department of Public Works are working on replacing a four-way stop sign at Lincoln and 41st Avenue with a traffic signal. I will keep you updated on our progress with that traffic light installation which will help keep traffic moving to Sunset Boulevard at a steady pace.

A recent news article created a stir with a headline about the removal of street parking along the San Francisco Zoo to create a protected bike lane. The new bike lane does not impact parking in the center of Sloat or on the residential side – and the article mentioned a new 100-space parking lot next to the Zoo. This bike lane project was not related to Prop. K. It was in the works long before and would have happened regardless of the outcome of Prop. K.

At the end of November, Rec. and Park announced it received a $1 million grant from the California State Coastal Conservancy Board. The grant will be used to help plan for dune restoration along the Great Highway, improved coastal access for everyone, better traffic management in nearby neighborhoods and community input on long-term park design.

I’ve requested Rec. and Park invite the community to a series of facilitated community discussions starting in the spring of 2025. The goal of those meetings is to gather neighborhood feedback on near-term park design and learn about any new traffic concerns that will require mitigation. These public meetings will include transportation professionals, park designers, neighborhood leaders and community members, as well as myself and my staff.

Recall

There have been news reports that a group of residents – including some who don’t live in District 4 or even San Francisco – are seeking to recall me from office because of my support for Prop. K.

Voters have a right to recall their elected leaders. I respectfully ask voters to consider the entirety of my work representing them, and not just this one issue.

I was elected on a platform of making neighborhoods safer, supporting small businesses, standing up for better public education and making it easier to build the housing families need to stay in San Francisco. As supervisor, I’ve successfully championed more police protection in the Sunset, fought to bring algebra back to middle schools, reduced permitting red tape for our small businesses and passed housing legislation designed for middle-income families and seniors. I also secured funding for Sunset Boulevard greenway improvements, delivered relief funds to Taraval merchants impacted by street reconstruction and created night markets with community partners.

Prop. K was put on the ballot by five supervisors and supported by the mayor. We felt every voter should have a say about what to do with a coast that belongs to everyone. There is precedent. The fate of the central freeway and the future of JFK Drive was decided by voters citywide. Even the people opposed to Prop. K put their own measure on the ballot in 2022. They asked voters everywhere to kill the weekend compromise and reopen the Upper Great Highway to cars 24/7.

My recall is being sought because I supported putting Prop. K to a democratic vote of the people. It’s important to note that a recall will not change the outcome or implementation of Prop. K.

I supported Prop. K because I believe it solves unavoidable concerns about the environment and what to do with a precious coast that belongs to all. I felt the people of San Francisco should be able to directly determine the future of their coastline. A majority of Sunset voters did not agree, and I invite every Sunset resident to work with me to address their concerns. I’ve also reached out to recall leaders to work together to solve common concerns about traffic flow and street safety.

While residents may disagree with me on this one issue, my door is always open to you on any topic. I’ve been a responsive supervisor on a myriad of issues that District 4 residents care about.

In full transparency, I supported past recalls of the school board and district attorney in 2022 because I felt they were failing to do the job they were elected to do. Parents felt the school board was more focused on renaming schools than getting kids back to school during the pandemic. Residents and crime victims felt the district attorney was not keeping them safe. These failures were fundamental to the job description. When Gov. Gavin Newsom was challenged with a recall in 2021, I opposed that effort. Although not every voter agreed with his policies or actions, he was doing the job voters elected him to do.

Moving Forward

I understand many Sunset residents rely on their cars to get around and there is a sense that City Hall is making it more difficult to be a car owner. My husband and I both drive every day, so we experience the same roads and pain points you do. If there are intersections or streets you are concerned about, please let me know and I will work to address those concerns. The same goes for where you think we need more stop signs or other traffic calming measures for pedestrian safety.

I’m committed to working with city agencies, our new mayor, and all Sunset residents to make Sunset streets safe and efficient.

Before Prop. K, it was known the Great Highway was losing its greatest utility as a direct connection to Daly City. With the southern section already set to close by the state Coastal Commission and legislated unanimously by the Board of Supervisors, all traffic will have to turn inland soon. Prop. K makes it possible to create a park by directing traffic to turn left at Lincoln instead of Sloat. Prop. K only applies to the stretch of road between Lincoln and Sloat that bypasses the Sunset without any on/off ramps for cars.

It’s important to note that Sunset residents, many living near the Great Highway, are leading the effort to create an oceanside park. They formed a group called Friends of Great Highway Park nearly four years ago. They came up with the idea and advocated for it. I agreed with this vision because I believe a park will be good for the environment, provide a boost to local businesses and bring joy to generations of people.

We can all agree on the need for safer residential streets and better traffic flow across the west side. I look forward to working with you to mitigate traffic concerns and address pedestrian safety.

Joel Engardio is the District 4 representative on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. He can be reached at engardio.com/contact.

9 replies »

  1. A couple of edits for accuracy:

    “a MINORITY of Sunset residents are leading the creation of the Great Highway Park” – Sunset residents voted 60-70% NO on K and did not want a Great Highway “Park”.

    They formed a group called Friends of Great Highway Park nearly four years ago. They came up with the idea and advocated for it. I agreed with this vision because I believe a park will be good for the environment “and I was brainwashed by a small vocal minority of anti-car, pro-bicycle only minority whose desire for recreation outweighed the day to day needs of my constituents to pick up children to and from school and other activities, go to medical appointments, commute to work, accomplish household chores requiring a car for heavy loads, and impeding trades people from getting to their work sites, and who cares if 20,000 vehicles/day now travel in front of their homes, it’s not my home”.

    “The Great Highway did NOT lose its utility as a commuting route” since the route east of the water treatment plant is easy and does not negatively impact households since that route does not have homes on those roads.

    “Contrary to my statements that the GH would not close immediately” Rec. and Park says the closure could happen in the first quarter of 2025.

    Prop. K was put on the ballot by five supervisors and supported by the mayor “however, one and hopefully a second supporting supervisor and the mayor lost their seats and support at City Hall for the closure of the Great Highway is decreasing”.

    There have been news reports that a group of residents – including some who don’t live in District 4 “but do live in District 1 who are greatly harmed by the closure of the major route for north south commuting and who voted 70% no on K. Richmond residents who can’t even GET to Sunset Blvd during events in GG Park such as Outside Lands and Hardly Strictly Bluegrass because of road closures in the park itself. Richmond residents for whom traffic blockages cause a normally 30 minute commute to SFO into a 90 min commute when the Great Highway and Outsides Lands close roads and create horrendous traffic”.

    We felt every voter should have a say about what to do with a coast that belongs to everyone “and therefore I will put to a city wide ballot closing Marina Blvd, the Embarcadero and any other major traffic artery to a city wide vote to close them and make them into parks because people with no idea of the impact to those that live there should have a say in voting yes to creating those problems”.

    “Conversion of stop signs to traffic signals at two intersections will mitigate the increased traffic and commuting times” (ha ha, April Fool’s Day).

    To summarize – the same old same old arguments for Prop K that did NOT persuade your constituents nor the District 1 voters or for that matter nearly the entire west side of SF that Prop K who voted overwhelming no. Only people with no skin in the game voted yes by these false arguments because they didn’t know the true picture. I read a Reddit thread where someone wrote “I can’t wrap my head around why anyone would vote No on creating a park” and that was quickly rebutted by dozens and dozens of replies that outlined all the problems and the fact that Prop K merely closed the road to cars without and funding for creating a park. Proponents of K used highly dubious “park” attendance numbers, false statements like “only a five minute longer commute”, and “the GH has lost its utility” for their arguments and people who actually USED the Great Highway were the ones who realized how false those arguments were.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. More nonsense from the Westside Traitor! If he wants to show that he is listening to his constituents, he would come out with a statement NOW that the Great Highway will NOT be closed until all of these traffic calming measures are completed on Lincoln Way and Sloat Blvd. In addition, hold off on closing the Great Hwy until the is actually funding in place for the alleged Great Highway Park.

    Like

    • Wouldn’t common sense have required that the traffic mitigation steps should be done FIRST to make sure they are sufficient BEFORE you close a major traffic artery? Also not closing GH to vehicles BEFORE you have the money in hand to actually make it into the promised “park”? No, ideology has prevailed over logic. Now an unused Great Highway will languish as the very few using it as a “park” (particularly in the rainy cold winter season ie first quarter of 2025) while a great many more people will pay the price in terms of longer commutes, increased traffic and vagrancy in front of their homes.

      Like

  3. He is such a liar!!! He stated he always wants to hear the concerns of the Sunset voters???

    Who is he kidding? If that were true he would have worked with the residents regarding these issues and stood up to the Bike Coalition and YIMBY and supported the compromise that the Richmond District supervisor did. I’m done with him…get him outta there and let Lurie appoint a supervisor that cares about the residents of the Sunset instead of their pocketbook and moving up the political food chain.

    Marty Murphy

    Like

  4. Thank you, Joel. You’ve done so much to address D4 and westside priorities, from doubling down on safety issues, to supporting algebra in middle schools to give SFUSD students a top-tier education, to supporting our small businesses and championing the night market to make our neighborhoods more lively. I know Prop K was controversial and many opposed it around here. But I also know that your job is about so much more than one issue, you’re working hard and making progress on many fronts, and are up for re-election anyways in 2026. So I hope D4 voters will decline to sign the recall petition and avoid bringing a costly, divisive, and unnecessary recall election to the city in 2025.

    Like

    • Algebra in bankrupt and closing schools? Recalls for thee, but not for me who lied?

      GIVE US A BREAK FROM THE BS.

      Like

  5. I will volunteer and do all that I can to make sure the disgrace of Engardio is recalled ASAP!!! He has no understanding of the district, its residents, or the basics of local government–NEVER create a problem where there isn’t one! The Breed has paid the price and Engardio will very soon follow.

    Like

  6. Make it easy on everyone and resign! We do not want you as our supervisor. Let’s face it, you probably caused Breed the Election with your Prop K. No more money for you from the Willie Brown Democratic machine. We can only hope you will take down Scott Weiner with you as well.

    Like

Leave a reply to Recall Engardio 2025 Cancel reply