letter to the editor

Letter to the Editor: Engardio Recall Justified

Engardio’s Betrayal and Ongoing Misrepresentations Justify His Recall

Editor:

Supervisor Joel Engardio promoted Prop. K by falsely characterizing the Upper Great Highway as a road that “lost its utility,” “was closed for sand removal 65 days every year,” and “if car-free would save on the $1.7 million yearly spent on maintenance because it would not need sand removal as often.” 

Voters were led to believe the Upper Great Highway was hardly used anymore by vehicles, practically abandoned, useless, and a financial drain. Engardio said diverting traffic would bypass the neighborhood and be unproblematic. His engineered campaign photos showed huge Sunday crowds, but those were rare, citywide events staged to sell Prop. K, and not a reflection of the public’s desired daily use of it, as the political spin inferred. 

The Facts:  

The Highway is Essential

Thousands of vehicles used it day and night. Engardio hid the words “commercial traffic” from the Voter Guide pretending closures would only affect private cars. Now big rigs, huge grocery vans, trucks, motorcycle caravans and heavy traffic barrel past homes, schools and churches disturbing the peace, polluting the air and endangering our once quiet beach community. 

Sand Removal Closures

In 2024, sand was removed from the highway only 14 times. Two lanes were temporarily closed in only one direction at a time while vehicles drove on the other two lanes until it fully reopened, usually by evening rush hour on the same day. It was not closed for 65 days a year as Engardio claimed. 

Current Sand Removal Costs

Since becoming Sunset Dunes “Park” in April 2025, sand was removed more often than in all 12 months of 2024. Sand removal is now more frequent, more labor-intensive and more expensive, requiring heavy machinery and hand-shoveling around new park structures. 

Future Sand Removal Expenses

Rec. and Park wants WEEKLY sand removal on Sunset Dunes, which will be exponentially more frequent and costly than before, but there is no funding. That $1.7 million to Public Works for sand management never happened, was a complete fabrication by Engardio’s Prop. K campaign, and the truth is Public Works hasn’t received even $900,000 annually for sand removal in well over a decade. 

Engardio misled voters to push his agenda. He’s now misrepresenting facts again to fight his recall. We can no longer trust our Supervisor.

We feel unsafe, betrayed and unrepresented. 

Vote Yes on Prop A by Sept. 16, 2025. Recall Joel Engardio.

Judi Gorski

6 replies »

  1. The bullet points listed above contain FACTS unlike the other side’s statements which are mostly false, misleading or unresponsive. Contrary to Engardio’s statements on sand removal days being 65 DAYS in ‘24, the reality was 14 DAYS and the multi-million in savings is laughable given that the the number of sand removal days is over 4x more in ‘25: another lie.

    Engardio misled his constituents by campaigning on a platform for D4 election by promising that he favored the “compromise”: open weekdays, closed F Noon to M 6am to reversing himself once elected to favor a Full 7 Day Closure and to create a park.

    I personally know 15 people who he told the same rhetoric to to get elected. Who knows how many others were told the same lies.

    Engardio needs to be RECALLED!

    Liked by 2 people

  2. BRAVA Judi Gorski!

    Having been insulted by Engardio, right to my face, because he couldn’t deal with my suggestion, because it challenged his hidden agenda, I could see clearly who he really is!

    There are those who see and hear what they choose, and that could explain the chaos of our-District4! VOTE YES ON SEPT. 16TH NF

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Well done! 100% FACTS!! It’s going to be an uphill battle to try and get the Great Highway reopened, but one thing is clear WESTSIDE TRAITOR Joel Engardio has to go!

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Thank you Judi. Joel avoids the facts. He skillfully uses language to gaslight and manipulate his own constituents. He is no longer trusted or respected by his constituents. He brought this all on himself with the bad decisions he has made. He did not read the room and he will pay the price. We must move on and choose/elect a real resident of the Sunset, someone who was not gerrymandered in to advance the fortunes of real estate developers and investors.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to parack Cancel reply