Divisive Westside Issues
I chose to reside on the west side of town due to its quiet suburban atmosphere, reduced traffic congestion, ample parking, lower crime rates and fewer challenges compared to other parts of the City.
However, these circumstances have shifted considerably in recent years. Issues such as Slow Streets, the closure of the Upper Great Highway and recall campaigns have contributed to heightened tensions among residents, resulting in prolonged debates on social media and increased unrest within the community.
A prominent current topic is the proposed upzoning plan. San Francisco faces a mandate to construct 82,000 new housing units by 2030, with a substantial allocation designated as affordable. To meet these requirements, the City intends to rezone certain areas to permit taller, multi-unit residences in neighborhoods previously zoned exclusively for single-family dwellings.
The plan entails increasing height and density allowances along major transit corridors, including Geary Boulevard, 19th Avenue and California, Clement, Balboa, Fulton, Irving, Judah, Noriega and Taraval streets, to promote development in underutilized zones. Proposed building heights may reach 65 feet, with some areas permitting up to 85 feet (six to eight stories).
Proponents argue that expanding housing supply will help stabilize or reduce prices, making homes more accessible for middle-income households, seniors and essential workers. Additionally, the targeted “well-resourced” zones could help address racial and economic segregation through upzoning. Concentrating development near public transportation aims to minimize car dependency, contain suburban sprawl, foster walkable neighborhoods and contribute to San Francisco’s sustainability efforts.
Opponents express concerns that upzoning may encourage speculation and inflate land values, potentially displacing existing residents before new housing is constructed. Research suggests property values in rezoned areas often increase due to developer activity. Further apprehensions include tenant displacement during redevelopment and doubts regarding true affordability, especially amid elevated construction costs and interest rates.
City infrastructures such as sewers, schools and parks are already under strain. New regulations, including daylighting laws restricting parking near intersections and the closure of the Upper Great Highway, have compounded issues related to parking availability and neighborhood traffic patterns. Moreover, many residents worry that increased building heights and density could undermine the character and appeal of established neighborhoods, which were significant factors influencing home purchasing decisions.
The upzoning proposal remains in draft form, subject to public review before approval in 2026. Community participation will be essential to achieving a balanced policy that advances housing objectives while preserving neighborhood values and mitigating adverse effects.
Another contentious matter on the west side is the recall of Supervisor Joel Engardio in the Sunset District. The recall election is scheduled for Sept. 16, with mail-in ballots expected to arrive around Aug. 18. Only District 4 residents are eligible to participate.
Engardio maintains he has served the Sunset District effectively and contends that the recall effort stems from disagreement over his stance on permanently closing the Upper Great Highway. Nonetheless, more than 10,000 constituents signed the recall petition, citing dissatisfaction with his representation, particularly on this issue.
This recall represents a notable contest between a well-funded campaign supported by technology sector contributors and a grassroots movement operating with limited resources. This engagement reflects a shift in community involvement, demonstrating that residents are increasingly proactive in addressing issues that impact their neighborhood.
Regardless of one’s position on rezoning or the Engardio recall, I encourage active engagement in local affairs, attendance at community meetings and participation in upcoming votes. Collective input is vital for shaping the future of our neighborhood.
John M. Lee is a broker with Compass specializing in the Richmond and Sunset districts. If you have any real estate questions, call him at 415-465-0505 or email johnlee@isellsf.com. Find an archive of his columns at RichmondSunsetNews.com.
| Sunset Homes Sold in July | ||||
| Address | Bed | Bath | Sq. Ft. | Price |
| 1955 33rd Ave. | 2 | 1 | 825 | $1,014,000 |
| 3727 Ulloa St. | 4 | 2 | 1,577 | 1,420,000 |
| 1871 25th Ave. | 3 | 3 | 2,112 | 1,510,000 |
| 1567 44th Ave. | 3 | 2 | 1,578 | 1,537,000 |
| 1655 24th Ave. | 2 | 1 | 1,335 | 1,641,750 |
| 2259 27th Ave. | 3 | 2.5 | 1,841 | 1,750,000 |
| 1630 Ninth Ave. | 3 | 1.5 | 1,600 | 1,950,000 |
| 1727 45th Ave. | 4 | 3 | 1,723 | 2,005,000 |
| 2578 Great Hwy. | 3 | 1 | 1,525 | 2,175,000 |
| 1779 29th Ave. | 4 | 3 | 1,986 | 2,268,000 |
| 2266 Cecilia Ave. | 3 | 2.5 | 2,486 | 2,500,000 |
| 700 Lawton St. | 5 | 4 | 3,490 | 2,790,000 |
| 1420 Sixth Ave. | 5 | 4 | 2,400 | 2,960,000 |
Categories: Real Estate














