Politics

Sunset Voters Recall D4 Supervisor Joel Engardio

By John Ferrannini

On Sept. 16, District 4 voters in the Sunset District decided they wanted to change who represents them at City Hall. With about a year left in his term, Supervisor Joel Engardio was recalled in a citizens’ revolt primarily over his support of the closure of the Upper Great Highway to vehicle traffic and the creation of the new Sunset Dunes park on the site.

The recall was decisive. According to the San Francisco Department of Elections, 62.72% voted in favor of the recall and 37.28% were opposed. Nearly 43% of the 50,273 registered District 4 voters turned out to vote in the special election.

“The residents of District 4 sent a message to Joel Engardio that they’re a lot smarter than he thought they were,” said Richard Corriea, a former San Francisco Police Department commander who helped lead the recall, at an election night party at Celia’s by the Beach restaurant.

Engardio rode the wave of westside voters feeling ignored by City Hall into office back in 2022, becoming the first person to unseat a sitting, elected supervisor (Gordon Mar) since the return of district elections a generation ago.

In a statement the night of the recall vote, Engardio was defiant. He argued his fateful decision to embrace 2024’s Proposition K – which replaced a compromise keeping the Upper Great Highway open to vehicle traffic on weekdays while it was used for outdoor recreation on the weekends – would one day be judged as having been on the right side of history.

“The Golden Gate Bridge faced a lot of resistance when it was proposed. Detractors called it an ‘upside down rat trap,’” Engardio said. “Thankfully, forward-looking people had the courage to build it anyway and create the icon of our City. This is the story of Sunset Dunes, and I invite you to visit. Find new ways to connect with nature. Discover the food, art and culture of the Sunset neighborhoods. Be inspired by your coast and your park.”

Engardio said that having the whole City vote on Prop. K, “allowed for more public debate in the most open, democratic and transparent process possible.”

Although the measure won citywide, it failed in every precinct of District 4. Sixty-four percent of District 4 voters rejected Prop. K.

It was also overwhelmingly rejected by Richmond District voters. Their representative, Supervisor Connie Chan, said she will “explore a ballot measure” to reopen the Upper Great Highway to vehicle traffic on weekdays.

In a statement, San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie – who will choose a successor to Engardio after Engardio vacates his seat on Oct. 10 – acknowledged voters’ concerns.

“As I campaigned for mayor last year, I heard countless westside families say what San Franciscans have been feeling for years – that their government is doing things to them, not with them, and that government is not working to make their lives better,” Lurie stated. “We will continue to be in constant communication with our partners in government and across communities as we work to make San Franciscans’ lives better. That means delivering a city that is safe and clean, where small businesses can thrive and the next generation of San Franciscans can afford to raise their children.”

At the election night party, Quentin Kopp, a former San Francisco supervisor, also spoke, rallying the crowd to oppose Lurie’s upzoning proposal, which he called the “next fight.” So too did recall organizer Otto Pippenger, who also used his Celia’s victory speech to deride Lurie’s proposal to increase property taxes to close the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s $322 million deficit.

Former supervisor Quentin Kopp (left) announces that San Francisco District 4 Supervisor Joel Engardio is likely recalled after election returns were first announced at the recallers’ victory party September 16 at Celia’s by the Beach in the Outer Sunset, while recall organizer Otto Pippenger (center) and proponent Richard Corriea (right) applaud. Photo by John Ferrannini.

The upzoning plan was approved by the SF Planning Commission on a 4-3 vote just days before the recall. It expanded the earlier Western Neighborhoods Plan to increase height limits on corridors such as Judah and Taraval streets.

State Sen. Scott Wiener lamented Engardio’s fate, stating that “various leaders of the recall movement … will deeply harm San Francisco and San Franciscans” if their plans are successful by “freezing the City in amber, destroying a popular park and stopping new housing (including in the Sunset, where home prices are explosively expensive),” if their plans are successful.

“Those of us who believe that for San Francisco to thrive it must be willing to build housing, create public spaces, and have a sustainable transportation system, will continue to fight for a strong future for the greatest city on the planet,” Wiener stated.

Wiener’s former political director, Todd David, now at Abundant SF, had a meeting with Engardio and current president of the Friends of Sunset Dunes Lucas Lux that was not disclosed on a copy of Engardio’s calendar provided to Corriea earlier this year. A previously released version of the calendar entry had disclosed the meeting, which is how the discrepancy was discovered.

Recall proponents revealed the matter in July and said Engardio should resign over it. For his part, Engardio attributed the mistake to “human error” in an interview.

The San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance Task Force voted 8-0 on Sept. 3 concluding Engardio was not in compliance with local ethics rules about his calendar. The task force forwarded the matter to the City’s ethics commission, which can decide to investigate.

According to Bill Barnickel, president of the Outer Sunset Merchants and Professional Association, Lurie told merchants at Andytown Coffee Roasters on Taraval Street he will appoint someone who wants to run for the next term, Mission Local (missionlocal.org) reported on Sept. 26.

Barnickel said the mayor made it clear.

“If we pick someone, we have to make sure they go into the next four years as the supervisor and do a good job,” he said.

13 replies »

  1. He’s claiming “human error” for 1-2 lines in the middle of an existing document being deleted with no other changes to the document, and that “just happens” to keep his secret meeting with conspirators to defraud the Sunset off the official record… and did anyone believe that even for a second?

    No, that’s not human error, that’s Engardio’s moral failure. When you get caught you admit what you did wrong. He doesn’t have that gene. He doubles down and throws out excuses regardless if they’re true or even make sense.

    That’s ultimately why he had to be recalled. He left us zero alternative.

    Like

    • A paragraph toward the end of the story was revised. See the last sentence.

      Wiener’s former political director, Todd David, now at Abundant SF, had a meeting with Engardio and current president of the Friends of Sunset Dunes Lucas Lux that was not disclosed on a copy of Engardio’s calendar provided to Corriea earlier this year. A previously released version of the calendar entry had disclosed the meeting, which is how the discrepancy was discovered.

      Like

      • Is that not exactly as described? It was omitted from an existing document.

        That’s not an accident. The circumstances are beyond suspect.

        Like

  2. I can’t believe that they are actually comparing sunset dunes to the golden gate bridge. A span that connects us to marin. You closed down the road that connects our city. You are doing opposite of what the bridge was built for. Sheesh. Some people. Smh

    Like

    • The Great Highway was used by many Peninsula Residents too! I hope they re-open it to cars. Weiner serves the Developers, so he shouldn’t get to “weigh in” on the new Supervisor! (But he’ll have a secret conversation about it, no doubt!

      Like

  3. Not a fan of any shady dealings if there were any, however, I think the replacement of a highway with a park is great idea. Reduction of car usage long-term is great for the environment and public safety. Now if we can just get a BART line out here one day maybe more of us could see the benefits of going car-fee.

    Like

    • It does not reduce car use whatsoever. They drive on narrow residential streets instead of a wide, safely timed roadway that is required to get around on the West Side, especially on weekends.

      Pretending it does anything useful environmentally is a flat out lie.

      Pretending it increases public safety is beyond a flat out lie.

      Anti-car zealots need a real job and a touch of the grass.

      Like

    • “CLOSING OFF A MAJOR HIGHWAY DOES NOT MAKE CARS GO POOF.” Commute times have doubled, even tripled, compared to before the UGH closure. The cars didn’t disappear — they got dumped onto neighborhood streets, right where families walk, kids bike, and seniors try to cross.

      And have you actually seen this so-called park? All of that “art, nature, and culture” crap could fit into less than half a soccer field — they didn’t need to shut down 100% of the highway. Only about 4% of the total space was actually used.

      Spare us the “car-free” fantasy talk until there’s actually a BART line, reliable Muni, and safe east-west access. Sunset Dunes isn’t a symbol of joy, it’s a symbol of hate: hate for working families, hate for seniors, hate for small businesses who got buried under traffic chaos and construction. It’s easy to say “less driving is good” when you’re not the one paying the price. The rest of us don’t get to teleport to work, school, or doctor appointments.

      Like

    • This able-ist anti-car BS needs to die. It’s not even factual.

      ALL Personal vehicle traffic does not even make up ~2% of worldwide emissions.

      These people are high on their own supply and pretending to save the world by lying to our faces about things science actually has settled.

      Like

Leave a reply to Jan Hom Cancel reply