Upper Great Highway

Sunset Supe May Face Recall Over Great Highway Closure

By Megan Robertson

Following the passing of Proposition K, a controversial ballot measure which now will turn the Upper Great Highway into a full-time city park, a group of westside residents are beginning their attempt to recall District 4 Supervisor Joel Engardio, who advocated for the measure to be on the ballot.

On Dec. 4, 2024, Richard Corriea and Vin Budhai submitted a formal letter of intent to recall Engardio. Budhai is the founder of Open the Great Highway and a resident of Engardio’s home district. Corriea is a longtime Richmond District resident, as well as the former president of the Planning Association for the Richmond and prior captain of the San Francisco Police Department’s Richmond Station.

Corriea and Budhai collected 80 signatures from District 4 residents, which are included in the Dec. 4 letter. Per the San Francisco Department of Election’s requirements, Engardio filed a formal response to the intent. Corriea and Budhai are now in the process of further signature collection, with the hopes of a special election in 2025, before Engardio’s term is up in early 2027.

Engardio won the seat in 2022 with 50.7% of the vote, narrowly beating incumbent Gordon Mar. He entered a heightened political landscape on the city’s westside surrounding the stretch of the Upper Great Highway between Lincoln Way and Sloat Boulevard. The roadway was closed to traffic completely in 2020 to provide residents a safe recreation area during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2022, the City landed on an agreement, to last until the end of 2025, which would close this stretch of the highway to most vehicle traffic on weekends.

This issue was made even more complicated when the SF Board of Supervisors unanimously voted in May 2024 to close the portion of the Great Highway south of Sloat Boulevard due to coastal erosion. While the highway no longer serves as a 100% direct route to Daly City for commuters, more than 14,000 drivers use the stretch from Lincoln to Sloat each day.

Richard Corriea (right) draws media attention as he turns a petition signed by 80 Sunset District residents over to the SF Department of Elections on Dec. 3, 2024, to start the recall process against District 4 Supervisor Joel Engardio. Photo by Paul Kozakiewicz.

Budhai said the thought of a recall did not come up until Engardio, along with four other supervisors, introduced Proposition K to the ballot last summer. The stated justifications for the recall are that Engardio should have done more outreach to constituents before putting the proposition on the ballot and that Engardio should never have put it on the ballot.

Outside of this issue, Budhai admitted Engardio has had many accomplishments for the district.

“The night markets, fixing potholes and things like that. These are all wonderful things. Don’t get me wrong,” Budhai said. “But they’re not the things that the community needs or relies on a daily basis. Drivers, commuters, they need to get back and forth from work to pick up and drop off their kids, and to get to hospital appointments.

“We feel that, as a leader of the community, you should have done some more outreach to your constituents, to your voters, to see how they would think or how they feel about you moving forward by putting this on the ballot for the entire City to vote on.”

Proposition K passed with only an approximate 30-40% support rate in the westside districts.

In an email statement, Engardio wrote, “I’m humbled by the views of residents who opposed Prop K.”

Engardio responded to the accusation that he did not do enough outreach to voters.

“Many said they didn’t feel heard in the process, and I take this feedback to heart,” he said. “I’m hearing loud and clear that we need safer residential streets and better traffic flow. These are valid concerns, which I share. That’s why I’m working with Mayor-elect Lurie to ensure key traffic improvements are made before implementing the Prop. K road closure.”

Traffic improvements by the city are planned for the coming months.

Budhai claims that part of Engardio’s initial election victory was due to his stance on keeping the Upper Great Highway compromise in place.

“It’s an act of betrayal against all of the voters and his constituents,” Budhai said. “A lot of folks were happy with the compromise and just said it is what it is. Let it be.”

Engardio disputed this claim via email.

“I’ve always talked about the pending closure of the Great Highway south of Sloat due to coastal erosion and how it would create the opportunity for a permanent oceanside park. This language has been on my website and platform since my campaign in 2022.”

Following the Board of Supervisors’ May vote to close the southern end of Great Highway, Engardio addressed the fate of the Upper Great Highway running along the edge of the Sunset District.

“Clarity was needed about what to do with the middle section of the road. There were only two ways to resolve this issue: Either by the voters directly or by the 11 members of the Board of Supervisors,” he said. “Either way, residents or supervisors on the east side would have a say. Rather than 11 supervisors deciding the future of our collective coast, a vote at the ballot box gave everyone a say. After all, the coast belongs to everyone.”

Engardio is in the process of releasing a “Stop the Engardio Recall” campaign and website.

District 4 Supervisor Joel Engardio may face a recall election over his efforts to close the Upper Great Highway to private vehicles. Photo by Michael Durand.

“Not everyone agrees, however, that my role in Prop. K is a recallable offense,” he stated. “I was one of five supervisors to put Prop. K to a democratic vote of the people. Voters have a democratic right to recall elected leaders, of course. But recalls should be reserved for elected officials who commit the most egregious offenses or who are unable or unwilling to fulfill the duties of their office. No matter the result, this recall will not change the outcome or implementation of Prop. K.”

“We just need someone that really truly represents all of the district and not just a small minor group that he’s advocating for right now. Ideally, we want to replace Joel Engardio with a supervisor that represents everyone,” Budhai said.

9 replies »

  1. Elon Musk says that San Francisco Board of Supervisors belongs in jail. Don’t be like Elon Musk. Love your city instead of hating it.

    Like

      • Recall Engardio 2025: We need to limit the number of comments we approve to prevent overloading posts with one reader’s opinion. We also don’t approve comments that are repetitive, that attack other commenters and who use name calling as a tactic. Making your case and using facts is the best use of our forum. Thank you.

        Like

    • We do love SF. We don’t like lies about paving the beach and privatizing the public commons for special interest groups. We don’t love Elon. Engardio isn’t SF.

      Like

  2. I think a recall would be disastrous for the Sunset. First, it would cost the city millions. But more importantly, right now, we have a supervisor who we elected and he knows he has to spend the next two years working his butt off to convince Sunset voters to re-elect him. If he’s recalled, he gets replaced by some random politico we don’t get to choose who will be completely beholden to the mayor. Engardio already came out against the 22-story tower on Sloat. If he’s recalled, whoever the mayor appoints will support it as a gift for the mayor’s real estate developer buddies. 

    Lurie ran on jumpstarting development and promised to put homeless shelters in every neighborhood. The last thing the Sunset needs is an appointed supervisor who is completely beholden to Lurie and won’t be able to say no to any of this. Better to let Engardio finish his term and ask tough questions of all the candidates next election. The last thing the Sunset needs is an appointed supervisor who nobody elected with zero independence from the mayor.

    Like

    • The City is bankrupt and footing the bill for non-funded programs that Breed and her lackey Engardio pushed through, knowing they were pushing SF into massive deficits for the foreseeable future. Engardio’s got a PR machine activated obviously now – paid for by Billionaires that backed Breed – and the Sunset will reject the lies and remember how they were ignored by a carpetbagger from Michigan.

      Like

  3. Engardio doesn’t represent the Sunset. Engardio represents a corrupt City Family that SF voters rejected for something new. District elections demand district representation.

    Like

  4. Ironic the Supervisor feels now “recalls should be reserved for elected officials who commit the most egregious offenses or who are unable or unwilling to fulfill the duties of their office” when he made his name spearheading and promoting the recall of 3 School Board members and a duly elected DA, none of whom engaged in any ‘egregious offenses’ or were ‘unable or unwilling to fulfill the duties of their office”.

    At worst, maybe they did not listen well to their constituents on some issues, but then neither did the Supervisor on the Great Highway issues!! So, the recall of the Supervisor seems to just be a case of justifiable Karma to me. I, for one will sign the recall. What goes around comes around. The Supervisor is a hypocrite.

    Like

  5. As a native living all my life in the Sunset I love SF…the Recall is the right process to remove an elected official who ignored a supermajority of his constituents to pander to a small group of Yimbys and the bike coalition. He should be removed from office for this betrayal.
    Marty Murphy

    Like

Leave a reply to City Family of Liars Cancel reply